muse-agent-example/tests/skills/clean-book-text/test_clean_detect_offline.py
zizi c9f69d9d6d 治理: Skill 测试治理第一阶段——harness 控制平面 + 实现测试迁出运行时目录
范围(不含 design-story-foundation、docs/、humanization/README.md 等进行中改动):

1. 新增 harness/ 控制平面
   - skill_harness.py 静态审计:32 个运行时 Skill 的 frontmatter/manifest/文档污染,当前 0 问题
   - run_selected.py 选择性执行器:manifest 与磁盘一一对账、依赖阻断、
     空跑与 skip-only 失败关闭、AST 测试形状门
   - manifests/skills.json:32 个 Skill 的合同责任方与协作领域登记
   - manifests/test-inventory.json:81 个测试资产登记
   - specs/skill-testing.md 与 README.md:测试分层、证据边界与 harness 职责

2. 实现测试从 .claude/skills/*/scripts/ 迁至 tests/skills/<skill>/
   - 71 个测试文件迁移并修复项目根与临时目录运行导入
   - 数据库触发器测试宽泛异常收窄为 psycopg.errors.RaiseException
   - 抽取离线大测试拆出真实 PG smoke(默认阻断,不计入离线通过)
   - 抽取 presence 去重边界拆出独立测试:493 + 78 = 571 项检查不变

3. 运行时文档清理
   - 13 个 SKILL.md 移除自测/离线验证段落、测试命令与测试文件事实源表述,
     只保留运行时合同;业务运行合同、额度、授权与离线模式均保留

4. SoT 同步
   - AGENTS.md:新增 Skill 领域索引(7 个合同责任方分组,覆盖 32 个运行时 Skill)
   - 领域 07:测试入口改由 harness/manifests/ 登记,SKILL.md 不承载测试命令
   - humanization 覆盖矩阵:活动测试路径同步迁移

验证证据: harness 自测 15 项 + runner 自测 13 项通过;静态审计 32 Skill / 0 问题;
73 个非数据库测试通过;8 个集成条目中 6 个 PostgreSQL 项被依赖门明确阻断;
py_compile 与 git diff --check 通过。未连接 PostgreSQL、网络、真实模型或额度。

已知边界: 真正 skill_behavior_eval 仍为 0,尚未验证任何 Skill 自然语言行为;
evaluate-frozen-replay 的 raw 存储边界冲突留待单独治理。
2026-08-19 01:50:20 +08:00

180 lines
9.4 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""clean_detect 失败关闭路径的纯离线回归测试。
红线:不连接数据库,不调用网络或真实 LLM。
chat_governed 与 extract_json 全部 mock/patch,只验证 clean_detect 在三种情形下的行为合同:
1. 治理链耗尽 → (None,None,None) → 写空占位+skipped,绝不返回假成功
2. JSON 解析失败 → 失败关闭,该窗不清洗、不拿坏数据当成功
3. 正常路径 → 正确解析 deletions(逐字原文+理由),不改写正文、不做删除
"""
import json
import pathlib
import sys
import tempfile
import unittest
from unittest.mock import patch
from click.testing import CliRunner
PROJECT_ROOT = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3]
SCRIPT_DIR = PROJECT_ROOT / ".claude" / "skills" / "clean-book-text" / "scripts"
sys.path.insert(0, str(SCRIPT_DIR))
import clean_detect # noqa: E402
class CleanDetectOfflineTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""覆盖 clean_detect 三条失败关闭/正常路径。"""
def setUp(self):
# 每个测试用独立 tmp 目录,patch OUT 使产物落在 tmp 而非真实 /tmp/muse-clean
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
self.tmp_path = pathlib.Path(self._tmp.name)
self.work_id = 99999 # 用不存在的 work_id 避免碰撞真实产物
self.work_dir = self.tmp_path / str(self.work_id)
self.work_dir.mkdir(parents=True)
# 写 manifest 和窗文本文件(模拟 clean_prep 的产出)
self.window_file = self.work_dir / "window-001.txt"
self.window_file.write_text(
"【第1章 | 开始】\n这是正文。\n一秒记住♂粒÷小÷说→网\n", encoding="utf-8")
manifest = {
"title": "测试书",
"windows": [
{"win": 1, "from": 1, "to": 1, "file": str(self.window_file)},
],
}
(self.work_dir / "manifest.json").write_text(
json.dumps(manifest, ensure_ascii=False), encoding="utf-8")
self.runner = CliRunner()
self.patcher = patch.object(clean_detect, "OUT", self.tmp_path)
self.patcher.start()
def tearDown(self):
self.patcher.stop()
self._tmp.cleanup()
def _invoke(self):
return self.runner.invoke(clean_detect.main, ["--work-id", str(self.work_id)])
# ── 情形1:治理链耗尽 ──────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_governance_chain_exhausted_writes_empty_placeholder_and_skips(self):
"""chat_governed 返回 (None,None,None) 时:写空占位+skipped,
不产生有效 deletions,绝不返回假成功。"""
with patch.object(clean_detect, "chat_governed", return_value=(None, None, None)):
result = self._invoke()
self.assertEqual(0, result.exit_code, f"命令应正常退出但输出:{result.output}")
# 产物文件存在
out_file = self.work_dir / "deletions-001.json"
self.assertTrue(out_file.exists(), "应写出空占位产物")
data = json.loads(out_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
# 核心断言:deletions 为空、有 skipped 标记
self.assertEqual([], data["deletions"], "治理链耗尽时 deletions 必须为空")
self.assertIn("skipped", data, "必须记 skipped 标记")
self.assertIn("治理链", data["skipped"], "skipped 原因应说明治理链耗尽")
# 不能出现 model 字段(那是成功路径才写的,避免被下游误当成功)
self.assertNotIn("model", data, "失败路径不应写 model 字段")
# 输出中应有跳过与不清洗提示
self.assertIn("跳过", result.output)
self.assertIn("不清洗", result.output)
# ── 情形2:JSON 解析失败 ────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_json_parse_failure_fails_closed(self):
"""chat_governed 成功但 extract_json 抛 ValueError 时:
失败关闭,不拿坏数据当成功。"""
fake_content = "这不是JSON,是模型的胡言乱语"
fake_usage = {"prompt_tokens": 100, "completion_tokens": 50}
with patch.object(clean_detect, "chat_governed",
return_value=(fake_content, fake_usage, "MiniMax-M3")), \
patch.object(clean_detect, "extract_json",
side_effect=ValueError("无法解析")):
result = self._invoke()
self.assertEqual(0, result.exit_code, f"命令应正常退出但输出:{result.output}")
out_file = self.work_dir / "deletions-001.json"
self.assertTrue(out_file.exists(), "应写出失败关闭产物")
data = json.loads(out_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
self.assertEqual([], data["deletions"], "解析失败时 deletions 必须为空")
self.assertIn("skipped", data, "必须记 skipped 标记")
self.assertIn("JSON", data["skipped"], "skipped 原因应说明 JSON 解析失败")
self.assertNotIn("model", data, "失败路径不应写 model 字段")
self.assertIn("解析失败", result.output)
self.assertIn("不清洗", result.output)
# ── 情形3:正常路径 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_valid_deletions_parsed_correctly_without_rewrite_or_delete(self):
"""chat_governed 返回合法 deletions JSON 时:正确解析产出(逐字原文+理由),
clean_detect 本身不改写正文、不做删除(删除是 clean_apply 的事)。"""
deletions = [
{"chapter_order": 1, "exact": "一秒记住♂粒÷小÷说→网", "reason": "书站广告变体"},
]
fake_content = json.dumps({"deletions": deletions}, ensure_ascii=False)
fake_usage = {"prompt_tokens": 5000, "completion_tokens": 200}
with patch.object(clean_detect, "chat_governed",
return_value=(fake_content, fake_usage, "MiniMax-M3")):
result = self._invoke()
self.assertEqual(0, result.exit_code, f"命令应正常退出但输出:{result.output}")
out_file = self.work_dir / "deletions-001.json"
self.assertTrue(out_file.exists())
data = json.loads(out_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
# 核心断言:deletions 正确解析,逐字原文与理由原样保留
self.assertEqual(1, len(data["deletions"]))
self.assertEqual("一秒记住♂粒÷小÷说→网", data["deletions"][0]["exact"])
self.assertEqual("书站广告变体", data["deletions"][0]["reason"])
self.assertEqual(1, data["deletions"][0]["chapter_order"])
# 成功路径写 model 字段
self.assertEqual("MiniMax-M3", data["model"])
# 不应有 skipped 标记
self.assertNotIn("skipped", data, "成功路径不应有 skipped 标记")
# clean_detect 不改写正文:源文件内容不变(删除是 clean_apply 的职责)
original_text = self.window_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
self.assertIn("一秒记住♂粒÷小÷说→网", original_text,
"源 txt 不应被改动(clean_detect 只探测不删除)")
self.assertIn("这是正文。", original_text, "正文不应被改动")
# 输出中应有检出提示
self.assertIn("检出 1 段", result.output)
# ── 情形3补充:空 deletions(该窗无垃圾)是成功路径而非 skipped ──────
def test_empty_deletions_is_success_not_skip(self):
"""模型返回空 deletions 表示该窗干净——是成功路径(写 model),不是 skipped。"""
fake_content = '{"deletions": []}'
fake_usage = {"prompt_tokens": 3000, "completion_tokens": 30}
with patch.object(clean_detect, "chat_governed",
return_value=(fake_content, fake_usage, "MiniMax-M3")):
result = self._invoke()
self.assertEqual(0, result.exit_code)
out_file = self.work_dir / "deletions-001.json"
data = json.loads(out_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
self.assertEqual([], data["deletions"])
self.assertEqual("MiniMax-M3", data["model"], "空 deletions 仍是成功路径,应写 model")
self.assertNotIn("skipped", data, "空 deletions 不是失败,不应有 skipped")
self.assertIn("检出 0 段", result.output)
# ── 断点续跑:已有产物时不调用 LLM ──────────────────────────────────
def test_existing_output_skipped_without_force(self):
"""已有产物文件时不调用 chat_governed(断点续跑幂等),--force 才重跑。"""
out_file = self.work_dir / "deletions-001.json"
out_file.write_text('{"deletions": [], "model": "old"}', encoding="utf-8")
with patch.object(clean_detect, "chat_governed") as mock_gov:
result = self._invoke()
mock_gov.assert_not_called()
self.assertEqual(0, result.exit_code)
self.assertIn("已有产物", result.output)
# 文件内容不变
data = json.loads(out_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
self.assertEqual("old", data["model"])
if __name__ == "__main__":
unittest.main(verbosity=2)